On Jun 3, 2010, at 5:18 AM, AlunFoto wrote: > 2010/6/2 steve harley <[email protected]>: > >> however Macs are extremely configurable for those who learn how; for example >> Time Machine may not be the best solution for photographers; among other >> reasons, those who use Lightroom or Aperture may wind up storing versions of >> databases that store versions, or users may already be exploiting backup >> features in these applications ... so photographers need to know how to >> configure Time Machine to avoid redundant redundancy, or how to choose an >> alternate backup scheme > > For those who learn how, nothing is difficult. My gripe with this was > that Apple seem to attract the users least likely to be bothered with > just that. Such a trust in any computer system seems quite unhealthy > to me. > > Or are there any Mac users here who can stand up and guarantee that a > Mac and a Time Machine will provide adequate backup of all user data > straight out of the box. From reading that famous document, the > manual, I'm not convinced. > > Jostein > I've restored from Time Machine on a number of occasions without difficulty. It seems to do an excellent job without my having to take any real action. It even backs up my encrypted files and enables restoration of them if they're lost or inadvertently altered.
Paul > > -- > http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ > http://alunfoto.blogspot.com > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
