I hear you Malcolm, ty for letting me know. Too bad though... Ecke 2010/6/29 Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmi...@btinternet.com>: > Hi Ecke, > >> This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten >> times and deleted it again. In a nutshell I would love for the >> etiquette of this list to make room for more critical comments, I >> rarely see anyone saying an image doesn't work but I do see an >> enormous difference in the number of positive responses per image so >> the going rule seems to be "nihil nisi bene" for most people and I >> tend to do the same thing because of not wanting to step on any >> toes... By the number of responses to my recent PESOs people were >> mostly underwhelmed by them so it would help me a lot to know why... >> My €0.02 > > It did happen at one time, again back in the days when Shel B used to post > regularly. There were one or two 'heated discussions' and the more critical > comments slowly subsided. > > Malcolm > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.