I hear you Malcolm, ty for letting me know. Too bad though...
Ecke

2010/6/29 Malcolm Smith <malcolmsmi...@btinternet.com>:
> Hi Ecke,
>
>> This is something currently on my mind. I wrote this reply about ten
>> times and deleted it again. In a nutshell I would love for the
>> etiquette of this list to make room for more critical comments, I
>> rarely see anyone saying an image doesn't work but I do see an
>> enormous difference in the number of positive responses per image so
>> the going rule seems to be "nihil nisi bene" for most people and I
>> tend to do the same thing because of not wanting to step on any
>> toes... By the number of responses to my recent PESOs people were
>> mostly underwhelmed by them so it would help me a lot to know why...
>> My €0.02
>
> It did happen at one time, again back in the days when Shel B used to post 
> regularly. There were one or two 'heated discussions' and the more critical 
> comments slowly subsided.
>
> Malcolm
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to