My main malfunction (on this topic at least) is that I prefer not to see the text and general confusion I find associated with many blogs(in general). It wasn't that I wanted to aggregate the contents of blogs all into one spot, or that clicking to see an image is much of a problem, it's more that I prefer to see only the image sans the blog.
:-) Different strokes I guess... I see the usefuleness of a feed in instances, Tom On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And what about the text blog? > > I don't understand the question. I thought we were talking about photography. > > If you subscribe to a blog that's mostly textual, the text appears in > your feed reader. (Some blogs publish the whole text of each post to > the feed; some publish a preview, requiring you to click through to > see the rest, mostly to sell more ads on their site. I'm far more > likely to read the former.) > > A feed is a feed. It can hold text, images, Flash movies, etc. > Whatever the author publishes to the feed shows up in your reader > without having to click through to a website. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
