JCO, Amen to that. It is quite common for me to pick an image for the PUG and then reject it once it is sized down - too much loss of detail. Perhaps we could suggest 2 sizes, 1 for slow connections and 1 for fast connections. We would each submit our current size and 1 more at a larger size. The viewer could then click on the one they want to view.
Bruce Dayton Saturday, February 02, 2002, 7:22:36 PM, you wrote: JCOC> Because the 600 pixel and 75K filesize limitations JCOC> are a joke. We might as well all be using 1 Mpixel JCOC> digital cameras. I just resized and jpegged a JCOC> very nice P67 B&W 8X10" and it looks like crap JCOC> with only 600 pixels max. What the point of using JCOC> all these fantastic Pentax lenses, and then reducing JCOC> the image to where its ruined?????? JCOC> I vote for larger picture dimentions and filesizes. JCOC> It's 2002 for christs sake, were using 1992 size JCOC> images. JCOC> JCO - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
