I'm certain that the K5 will show considerably less high ISO noise than the K7. However, I find that when exposures are accurate, noise with the k7 isn't objectionable up to ISO 800 or even 1600. For some purposes, like concert pics, 3200 is just fine.
I expect that the K5 will soon be my main camera, with the K7 going to back up. Paul Paul On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love wrote: > Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the > new bodies to avoid noise? Like seriously, if I didn't have noise reduction > in LR these days, I'd be trashing a LOT of my stuff - something I never had > to do with the *istD. > > I need a second body very soon and was going to get a K-x just due to the > noise thing, but thinking maybe I'll wait for the K-5 and the K-7 can become > my second shooter/backup if the noise has been addressed. > > tan.x. > > > Tanya Love > Photographer > www.lovebytes.com.au > m: 0458 006 740 > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
