This is an interesting line of conversation for me, as I NEVER use anything BUT the centre focus point. I am in such a habit of positioning that point on whatever I want in focus and half-pressing to lock it, then moving the camera to recompose the shot, I find it clumsy and time-consuming to play with focus points. Especially, when I am shooting fast moving kids, it is so intuitive to me now, to do as I just mentioned and I just don't even think about it anymore.
Would I benefit, do you think from changing this habit and selecting individual focus points? Is there a way of doing this quickly, and without lots of button pressing? Tan. :) Tanya Love Photographer www.lovebytes.com.au m: 0458 006 740 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of paul stenquist Sent: Monday, 20 September 2010 7:00 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: For those who wants spec sheets before announcement On Sep 19, 2010, at 4:47 PM, William Robb wrote: > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "paul stenquist" > Subject: Re: For those who wants spec sheets before announcement > > >>> >>> Ok, Found the specs at DPReview. I take it SAFOX IX+ is a crippled whore that can run a little faster? >>> Note to Pentax: Put a new AF into your cameras and stop hobbling them with an 11 point system. >> >> I think I'll wait to hear from someone who has actually TRIED the K5 autofocus before passing judgement. I always pick my own focus points, and 11 are adequate. All I want is better lock on. The K7 is a lot better than the K20. I suspect this camera will be another significant improvement. But like I said, I'm not going to pass judgement, based on the DP whiners. > > Obviously we don't have the same wants in a camera, 11 points in the current emulation is at best adequate sometimes, and at worst is inadequate much of the time. I always pick my AF point as well, and sometimes, there is even a focus point where I want it to be. > The major exception to this is studio portraiture (which you don't do a lot of), where the end point isn't ever in the right spot and the next tier in is too close to the center to be of any use. > I wouldn't mind the 11 point AF if they'd move the points around a bit to make them useful, but I suspect that losing the left hand point and moving it to the right side and moving both end sensors off center halfway between the location of the mid point sensors would cause the people who think the present system is adequate to whine like a 747 coming in for a landing. While I don't do a lot of studio portraiture, I do some, and I frequently shoot people. I admit I sometimes have to reposition from the top or second tier outside point before clicking the shutter. I guess I've learned to live with that inconvenience and don't even think about it. But a few more points in that area wold be helpful. However, I still want the fast, low-light lock on the most. That would make ti a winner for me. Paul > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
