B etter high iso noise and autofocus than theK-7, along with higher resolution. Much better autofocus and exposure control than the Kx, along with much higher resolution, weatherproofing, and better build quality. That's a fast and dirty summary that is somewhat incomplete but hits most of the important points. Paul On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
> I realize that there was a protracted thread on this that veered off course a > bit. Can anyone offer (in a sentence or two) why a person who has a K-7 would > want to or need to upgrade to a K-5? Would a K-5 be considered to have the > improvements of a K-x but in a much more durable body? > > Jeffery > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
