That's what I was looking for. Thanks Paul. I haven' run into some of the autofocus problems that others have experienced with the Pentax dSLRs, so I don't know if it is a design flaw or a quality control problem that people are experiencing. But I don't really use many lenses with a huge focusing throw (like macro) where the lens searches a lot for a focus. My macro is on an Olympus E-1 (and it can be problematic on that camera).
Jeffery On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:06 PM, paul stenquist wrote: > B etter high iso noise and autofocus than theK-7, along with higher > resolution. Much better autofocus and exposure control than the Kx, along > with much higher resolution, weatherproofing, and better build quality. > That's a fast and dirty summary that is somewhat incomplete but hits most of > the important points. > Paul > On Sep 29, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > >> I realize that there was a protracted thread on this that veered off course >> a bit. Can anyone offer (in a sentence or two) why a person who has a K-7 >> would want to or need to upgrade to a K-5? Would a K-5 be considered to have >> the improvements of a K-x but in a much more durable body? >> >> Jeffery >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
