On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Eric Weir wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Bong Manayon wrote: > >> I think I have used all of the 135's Pentax could dish out (except for >> the *s which I could not afford) including the non-SMC Takumars (both >> the 2.5 and 2.8 versions). They are surprisingly sharp although with >> a real bad propensity to flare. At the end of the day, I still have >> the... >> >> SMC Pentax K 135/2.5 >> SMC Takumar 135/2.5 (M42) >> SMC Pentax A 135/2.8 >> >> My favorite is still the K version. About the A version, comments in >> Stan's page is spot on, but it was the lens I had with me when I took >> this: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bongmanayon/2695572641/ > > Thanks, Bong. While I'm at it, I've perused your photos on the Pentax site > more than once. I love them. And you do seem to have a lot of equipment. As > many cameras as most people have lenses?
Heh! A couple weeks ago a friend noticed that I had more than just a couple of cameras, and asked how many. Even counting the dead ones, the freebie 35mms and the old polaroids it was something like 24 bodies. Mind you, I use less than half a dozen of them on a regular basis. If experience holds, this should lead to a thread with people enumerating each of their cameras, with several side discussions on particular models, culminating in a series of puns, probably about cormorants. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
