Np contest. The M 135/3.5 is a far better lens: sharper, less flare,
and better built.
Paul
On Oct 12, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
Following a treat of breakfast at a wonderful little Ethiopian
restaurant here, I stopped by Wings Camera, which sells mostly used
stuff, a couple doors down. Went to the Pentax shelf to see what
they had. First lens I picked up was a Takumar 135/2.5. Over the
weekend a couple folks suggested the Pentax M 135/3.5 as a great,
inexpensive option to consider for my trip to Northern Arizona.
They'll take $40 for the Takumar, but the Pentax is available from
KEH, also right here in Atlanta, for $45 to $65. I'm wondering if
anyone here's familiar with the Takumar and might have a sense of
how it compares to the Pentax.
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
[email protected]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
