etc, etc, etc, etc....
--- On Sun, 10/24/10, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Bob W <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: OT: new camera > To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, October 24, 2010, 11:42 AM > > to some extent. i think > insulting someone based on an inherent property or > > trait is crossing a line. calling names is fine short > of that line IMO but > not > > beyond it. i can handle pompous twit as an insult just > fine but faggot is > too > > much > > why? isn't pompous twittery also an inherent trait? If you > limit other > people's right to say things you don't like, someone else > will limit your > right to say things they don't like. We all know where that > leads. > > Secondly, why do you limit it to inherent properties, > whatever that means? > What if being gay turns out not to be an inherent property? > Does that > suddenly make it ok to insult gay people? I don't think > so. > > B > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
