On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Matthew Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, David J Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So when i comes time to upgrade, if i'm allowed, it looks like not >> only the expense of the camera, possibly lenses as well, but new >> computers and software. >> >> Something i dont remember having to worry about in the film days. > > >From my point of view, a computer is something that needs to be > upgraded every few years whether I use it for photography or not. > Some portion of the expense can be "charged" to photography, but not > all of it. I guess it depends on what all you use it for.
It does, in fact, depend what you use it for. Aside from photography, my 11 year old 500MHz Celeron machine works just fine. If your work doesn't rely on some specific version of whatever application you're running, computers can simply be upgraded when they fail. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/ __o _'\<,_ (*)/ (*) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
