DagT wrote:

Dario Bonazza wrote:

And a CSC (EVIL or not) will require another line of lenses. That will have
priority over a possible 24x36 system.
However, I admit I would consider buying a Pentax 24x36 DSLR, while I don't
think about the 645D as a possible target of mine.

I don't think I would. If the K-5 is good at High ISO and the AF is improved over K20D I can't see the reason why I would need it. > The combination of ISO6400 and SR is more than enough for my use. I've made a 60x90cm print from of a K20D picture (the same that was in the Chicago exhibition) so resolution is good enough (for me). The only difference would be in stop difference in DOF, but it's not worth the extra cost or size. I would like to see a DA*24 2.0 and a DA*35 1.4 to match the DA*55. They would be expensive, but not as expensive as a new camera system.

I fully agree, as I've spent hours and hours supporting that point of view here and elsewhere. I strongly believe that 99% of the photographers have no real need to go beyond APS-C, and the new-generation APS-C sensors will raise that percentage even more, but... there are a few exceptions when dealing with specific applications such as shooting moving subjects in very dim light. Last year I've lost a job opportunity after my ballet pics (shot with K20D @3200/6400) were compared to those taken with a Nikon D3s and a D700. The customers agreed my pics were better varied and pleasant from the artistic point of view, but not all of them allowed large prints (a critical issue), while the shots of the Nikon guys were "good enough" and allowed larger prints on a more consistent basis :-( Now the K-5 is approaching that performance, but A D700-like Pentax would establish full balance. So I could consider buying such a camera (or its equivalent based on the technology of that era) if/when it will be introduced (never, afaik) and adding a m43 system for minor accomplishments/leisure.

Dario

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to