I've heard a few nice comments about the K5 AF. Thus far I've treated them like UFO sightings, but maybe. . .
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Dario Bonazza <[email protected]> wrote: > P N Stenquist wrote: > >> I rarely read Pentax forum, but I did today since I'm curious about their >> k-5 posts. This guy claims to be a Canon shooter and says the K-5 autofocus >> is superior. I haven't tested the autofocus enough to determine how good it >> is, but I have yet to experience a problem. Interesting that he's not that >> wild about the high ISO performance of the Pentax, which pretty much blew >> me away. Perhaps the 5000 is very good in that regard. Don't know. > > I've tested it some time ago: the 5D MkII is very good in that regard. > > Dario > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
