At 01:28 8-2-2002 -0500, you wrote: (about the 24-35) >From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >It's so much better than the A24~50/4.0 ... smaller, lighter, faster, >easier to handle, sharper, less prone to flare, better build quality >(IMO) and there are a few decent lens hood options - and perhaps a bit >more scarce. The 24~50 seemed like a great idea when I bought it new, >but it's only been used a few times in 20 years or so. I've used the >24~35 more than that in just a few weeks time last year.
I have the M24-50. I too thought it a great idea when I bought it. I used to own a tamron adaptall 28-50 which I liked apart from the slight yellow cast it used to give and this was bought to replace it. I have found I never use it and it's still sitting in its box. Not that I don't like the quality or anything, I just don't particularly like two touch zooms. Last time it came out was two years ago when it went to London with me. Wendy --- Wendy Beard Ottawa, Canada mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] home page http://www.beard-redfern.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
