With any luck, it'll cause a precipitous price drop for the K-r and
bring it further down into the entry-level range, and I'll be able to
have illuminated focus points, improved low-light focusing, and higher
frame rate for a fairly good price as I begin to approach 50,000 clicks
on my K-x.
That is, assuming I haven't managed to save up for a K-5 by then --
which, at this point, strikes me as a fairly dubious proposition.
-- Walt
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 7:08 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Bruce Walker<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10-11-16 7:07 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Indeed...and the K-5 is growing a very good reputation in the
'industry'...(lesnumeriques just tested the 60D and they say that it is a
good
camera but not at the level of K-5/D7000)
The looser here semms the K-r...well...maybe the success of the K-x was
based on
the fact that it surpassed the K-7 in some respects, and this is not the
case of
the K-r vs. K-5.
Regards,
Jaume
It can only be a good thing that the K-5 trounces the K-r in *all* respects.
There was clear confusion in the market (as evidenced by the PDML
sub-market) that the K-x beat the K-7 in a few ways and that hurt the K-7's
reputation and Pentax sales.
The K-5 seems to be entirely made of win. The K-r should benefit from the
new Pentax halo effect.
-bmw
I think the K-r's biggest problem is that it's too much a K-x with
tweaks and the K-x is just so cheap now that the price difference is a
bit hard to justify for many. Still looks like a great little camera
but it's lost between the much higher-end K-5 and the much cheaper
K-x.
--Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
