You need to capture some of the wildlife, then you'll have a pack animal. -T
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Colen" <[email protected]> > > Subject: It's a great lens, but not what I bought it for > > >> When I bought my sigma 20/1.8, the intention was to use it for indoor, low >> light, dance photography. For various reasons, mostly involving manual >> focus, it hasn't proven to be as good for that as I had hoped. On the other >> hand, I'm finding it very handy as a wide angle macro lens. For example, a >> lot of the time that I'm shooting mushrooms, to get the angle I want, I need >> to be very close to the subject because roots of the stump, or the ground, >> is in the way if I'm trying to use a longer lens. >> >> Does anybody else have lenses that they bought for one use, that they >> later found are much better for something else entirely? > > Yep. I bought my 600 FA for wildlife photography and found it was much > better for other people to carry. > >> >> -- >> Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
