On Dec 1, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > Larry Colen wrote: > >> >> On Dec 1, 2010, at 7:29 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: >> >> I do have a question for Mark. I was working on the assumption that I want >> lightroom to produce the jpeg >> in the size to be used by the blurb software, rather than having blurb >> resize the photos. Was I correct? > > Lightroom would probably be better. I size everything in Photoshop, > because I have the ability to select the resizing algorithm (bicubic, > bicubic smoother, etc.) - there's no way of knowing what the Blurb > software is doing and I don't think you can select the algorithm in > Lightroom either.
I wouldn't even know which algorithm to choose, or why. > > Frankly, for something as critical as photos for a book, I'd always do > final editing in Photoshop rather than Lightroom. I am going to need to learn photoshop one of these days. This was supposed to be a quick and dirty job where I wasn't going to sweat every detail, lest I barely finish it in time for the holidays next year. One of the things I did last night was add notes to some of the photos. For page 38, cormorants in love (page 16 is lawyers in love) I mention: Cormorants are the official bird of the PDML, the Pentax Discuss Mailing List, a profligate source of good advice and bad puns. I may have exaggerated the quality of advice available on the list. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
