Of course, the "yes" people are more likely to respond. What's more, from the descriptions, it sounds like some of these folks are just seeing a bit of sensor dust. Probably never looked for it before. Paul On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:21 PM, Miserere wrote:
> On 6 December 2010 20:03, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's a list of tested cameras from PF. Is this akin to everyone on an >> airplane getting sick at the same time? BTW, my unaffected camera is >> 3823799. The condition doesn't seem to be serial number specific. >> Paul >> >> 382xxxx - yes >> 3820670 - no >> 3820688 - yes >> 3820888 - yes >> 38226xx - yes >> 3822724 - yes >> 3822871 - yes >> 3823812 - no >> 3823850 - no >> 3823862 - no >> 3823875 - yes >> 3823936 - no >> 3823993 - yes >> 3825xxx - yes >> 3827069 - yes >> 3828xxx - no >> 3830xxx - yes >> 3836407 - no >> 3839502 - yes >> 3842*** - yes >> 3842409 - yes >> 3842568 - yes >> 3849.. - yes >> 3849889 - no >> 3850... - yes ( a dot is a yes Blende) >> 3850011 - yes >> 3850025 - yes >> 38506xx - yes >> 3851607 - yes >> 3858324 - yes >> 3877*** - no >> 3889... - no >> 3889359 - yes >> 3890099 - yes >> 3894*** - no >> 3894706 - no >> 3900xxx. - no >> (updated..... ) >> >> Read more at: >> http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#ixzz17NpJyTTi > > > Ouch! > > http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#post1293433 > > That's nasty... > > My unit is a 3889xxx > > > —M. > > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > > http://EnticingTheLight.com > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
