Of course, if one were to look for a bright side in all of this,
they might put two-and-two together and realize that what this all
really boils down to is some pretty good deals on refurbs in the
not-too-distant future.
And the circle of life goes on.
-- Walt
On 12/6/2010 8:21 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 6 December 2010 20:03, paul stenquist<[email protected]> wrote:
Here's a list of tested cameras from PF. Is this akin to everyone on an
airplane getting sick at the same time? BTW, my unaffected camera is 3823799.
The condition doesn't seem to be serial number specific.
Paul
382xxxx - yes
3820670 - no
3820688 - yes
3820888 - yes
38226xx - yes
3822724 - yes
3822871 - yes
3823812 - no
3823850 - no
3823862 - no
3823875 - yes
3823936 - no
3823993 - yes
3825xxx - yes
3827069 - yes
3828xxx - no
3830xxx - yes
3836407 - no
3839502 - yes
3842*** - yes
3842409 - yes
3842568 - yes
3849.. - yes
3849889 - no
3850... - yes ( a dot is a yes Blende)
3850011 - yes
3850025 - yes
38506xx - yes
3851607 - yes
3858324 - yes
3877*** - no
3889... - no
3889359 - yes
3890099 - yes
3894*** - no
3894706 - no
3900xxx. - no
(updated..... )
Read more at:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#ixzz17NpJyTTi
Ouch!
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/125009-stains-your-k5d-sensor-poll-5.html#post1293433
That's nasty...
My unit is a 3889xxx
—M.
\/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
