Believe I prefer the "softened focus."
I've never hesitated to clone at will for any use including submission to the 
PPG. Drastic element manipulation would give me pause.


Jack

--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Walter Gilbert <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PESO: A Swallowtail in Respite
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 1:44 PM
>   I don't think they allow any
> sort of cloning in the images, and only 
> minor filter effects -- and not being adept at cloning at
> all, would 
> most likely make a complete hash of it anyway.  :-)
> 
> I've done up a couple of versions both resized to the
> 600-pixel height 
> required for submission:
> 
> Crop with plain focus: http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5244452247/
> 
> Crop with softened focus:  
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5244451549/
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> -- Walt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/8/2010 3:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> > Think I'd try cloning that dominant leaf/branch coming
> in just below the ULC. Completely, if you find it readily
> doable. If not, just send it. :)
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter Gilbert<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Walter Gilbert<[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: PESO: A Swallowtail in Respite
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<[email protected]>
> >> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 1:19 PM
> >>    Oh, I agree that the butterfly
> >> is the real strength of the image.  I
> >> was just being a bit facetious about the busy-ness
> of the
> >> background.
> >>
> >> In doing the crop, when I try to lop off a bit on
> the
> >> right, it seems to
> >> have the unfortunate effect of accentuating the
> fan leaf
> >> that extends
> >> down from the upper-left side, which looks pretty
> >> distracting to me. 
> >> The biggest part of the problem is that it extends
> so far
> >> down into the
> >> frame that it's tough to get around without
> turning it into
> >> an
> >> overly-severe crop.
> >>
> >> Also, I'm hesitant to do much more with it as it
> was among
> >> my earlier
> >> shots and I wasn't vigilant about keeping my
> original
> >> images back then. 
> >> So, unfortunately, that's the highest resolution
> version
> >> copy I have --
> >> 1600 pixels long-side.  I hate to give up
> much more
> >> resolution than
> >> that.  At this point, I'm inclined to submit
> it as-is,
> >> and if it gets
> >> rejected, do a little cropping and maybe do a
> little
> >> graduated softening
> >> of focus around the edges to obscure that part of
> the fan
> >> leaf and see
> >> if that'll give it a boost.
> >>
> >> Idunno ... what do you think?
> >>
> >> -- Walt
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/8/2010 2:33 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>> Walt, I think the strength of the image is the
> black
> >> butterfly.
> >>> I might do some cropping, especially on the
> right
> >> side.
> >>> Jack
> >>>
> >>> --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter Gilbert<[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> From: Walter Gilbert<[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: Re: PESO: A Swallowtail in
> Respite
> >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<[email protected]>
> >>>> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 12:28
> PM
> >>>>      Thanks, Jack.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think you hit upon why I was iffy on
> that shot.
> >>>> It's not so much the
> >>>> lack of vividness, but the fact that the
> butterfly
> >> itself
> >>>> is somewhat
> >>>> bland in comparison to the mimosa
> tree.  Hmm
> >> ... come
> >>>> to think of it,
> >>>> maybe I should have named it "Mimosa Tree
> with a
> >> Butterfly
> >>>> on it".
> >>>>
> >>>> -- Walt
> >>>>
> >>>> On 12/8/2010 2:00 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> >>>>> The PPG offerings continue to include
> an
> >> extremely
> >>>> large number of butterflies. Such a number
> tends
> >> to numb the
> >>>> voter to the point of being difficult to
> overcome,
> >> thus
> >>>> placing such images at somewhat of a
> >> disadvantage.(?)
> >>>>> This image, however, I feel is unique
> enough
> >> to have a
> >>>> good chance at making it in. Even though
> there it
> >> rather
> >>>> more going on in the background than it
> would
> >> really need,
> >>>> I'd enter it.
> >>>>> Jack<yes>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Walter
> Gilbert<[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Walter Gilbert<[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: PESO: A Swallowtail
> in
> >> Respite
> >>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail
> List"<[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010,
> 11:45
> >> AM
> >>>>>>   
>    Oops ... forgot
> >> the deets:
> >>>>>> K-x, Asahi Takumar 135/2.5, ISO
> 200,
> >> 1/320,
> >>>> Aperture
> >>>>>> priority, unknown aperture
> setting.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12/8/2010 1:38 PM, Walter
> Gilbert
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>        Hi
> all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here's another butterfly shot
> I'm
> >> considering
> >>>>>> submitting to the PPG and thought
> I'd get
> >> some
> >>>> opinions on
> >>>>>> beforehand.  I'm just a tad
> "iffy" on
> >> it, as
> >>>> it just
> >>>>>> doesn't strike me as particularly
> vivid
> >> --
> >>>> something I'm
> >>>>>> partial to in my butterfly
> images.
> >> Of
> >>>> course, it's a
> >>>>>> matter of taste -- which is why I
> thought
> >> I'd get
> >>>> input from
> >>>>>> the list.  Anyway, here it
> is:
> >>>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/walt_gilbert/5244166815/#/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Comments, critiques,
> suggestions, and
> >> gift
> >>>>>> certificates from KEH eagerly
> accepted.
> >>>>>>> -- Walt
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
> please visit
> >> the
> >>>> link
> >>>>>> directly above and follow the
> directions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
> the
> >> link
> >>>> directly above and follow the directions.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link
> >> directly above and follow the directions.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to