Were you able to "sharpen them"? There's nothing special about RAW that would cause them not to be sharp, except of course that the camera doesn't really sharpen them.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Eric Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Shot my first batch of RAW images a week ago on a trip to Pittsburgh > occasioned by a death in the family. With Paul Sorenson's help I've gotten > them out of the camera and onto the computer using a LR import preset he had > recommended. I'm a bit disappointed in what I see. Almost nothing is really > sharp. Much is not sharp at all. It seems to be my biggest challenge at the > moment. > > That said, I understand RAW allows more leeway for making post-capture > corrections. There are some images I like that are a little to a lot > underexposed. There is one whole group, in which I'm especially interested, > that were shot at ISO 3200. I have absolutely no idea where to start. There > are so many things that can be changed, I have no idea what the names of most > of them mean -- hue? saturation? luminance? > > A video that Paul recommended to me -- it was about the preset he uses -- > suggests that there are a few especially critical parameters that might > improve these images significantly, and provide me a place to start learning. > I'm open to suggestions about things to try. > > Thanks, > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Eric Weir > Decatur, GA USA > [email protected] > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
