I've read that the close focus distance is large. Funny, because its a "macro" at 135. My concern is image quality. If it can't do that, what's the point? -----Original Message----- From: Nick David Wright <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:04:55 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: F 35-135 3.5-4.5
I had this lens many years ago. I don't remember much specifics concerning image quality, but I never had any complaints in that department. I remember it was rather large and heavy for a lens in its range. The only thing I didn't care for was it had a very far minimum focus distance. ~Nick On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > Anybody know anything about this lens? I checked out Pentaxforums and > Stan's page. Lots of specs and very few opinions. > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
