It's definitely not legal in Alabama.  It may go by county in VA.

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:12 PM, P. J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/2/2011 1:32 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>>
>> "Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose."
>>
>> That's not legal in Virginia.  ;-)
>
> You sure you mean Virginia.
>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessoms<[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> From: "Jens"
>>>
>>>> Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my question.
>>>> I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I was
>>>> using old film and a questionable lab for developing.
>>>> My result is shown at flickr.
>>>> I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame
>>>> with my K-7 and with my 67. I enlarged one eye to be able to evaluate
>>>> the resolution and sharpness:
>>>> K-7:
>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204650099/in/set-72157625461434140/
>>>> 67:
>>>>  http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204621235/in/set-72157625461434140/
>>>>
>>>> In my small, not too well done ,test it seems that the K-7 is doing
>>>> rather well.
>>>> In order to convince myself, that I should keep on using the 67 (insted
>>>> of selling it) I need results that show, that the 67 delivers reslults
>>>> that are superior to those of the K-7.
>>>
>>> You're losing quality scanning the negative. Don't blame the negative
>>> for problems due to the fairly low resolution scan.
>>>
>>> The Epson 3200 doesn't deliver sharp results scanning negatives. That's
>>> not what it's designed for.
>>>
>>> It does remarkably well all things considered, but it's not the best
>>> tool for the job if you need high quality, high resolution scans from
>>> your negatives. At best it's a tool for identifying those negatives that
>>> might yield good results from high resolution scans.
>>>
>>> Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That will impose a
>>> handicap
>>> on its resolution comparable to what the scans impose on your 67
>>> negatives.
>>>
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
>
>        --Marvin the Martian.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to