Sides, you'd have to take them off to do that..I'm guessing here, of course!
Jack --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Re: Pentax 67 resolution compared to 15 MP Digital > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 10:32 AM > "Try shooting the K7 through a pair > of pantyhose." > > That's not legal in Virginia. ;-) > > > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:58 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: "Jens" > > > >> Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and > answering my question. > >> I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn > out too well. But I was > >> using old film and a questionable lab for > developing. > >> My result is shown at flickr. > >> I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) > filling out the frame > >> with my K-7 and with my 67. I enlarged one eye to > be able to evaluate > >> the resolution and sharpness: > >> K-7: > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204650099/in/set-72157625461434140/ > >> 67: > >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204621235/in/set-72157625461434140/ > >> > >> In my small, not too well done ,test it seems that > the K-7 is doing > >> rather well. > >> In order to convince myself, that I should keep on > using the 67 (insted > >> of selling it) I need results that show, that the > 67 delivers reslults > >> that are superior to those of the K-7. > > > > You're losing quality scanning the negative. Don't > blame the negative > > for problems due to the fairly low resolution scan. > > > > The Epson 3200 doesn't deliver sharp results scanning > negatives. That's > > not what it's designed for. > > > > It does remarkably well all things considered, but > it's not the best > > tool for the job if you need high quality, high > resolution scans from > > your negatives. At best it's a tool for identifying > those negatives that > > might yield good results from high resolution scans. > > > > Try shooting the K7 through a pair of pantyhose. That > will impose a handicap > > on its resolution comparable to what the scans impose > on your 67 negatives. > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
