I think it's obviously a viable product. It's priced lower then the MF competition and only slightly above the potentially inferior 24 x 36 sensor cameras. Paul
On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > Interesting. A viable product? I'm not convinced, but it is > interesting to speculate about he 645D as a minor but real competitor > to the high end Nikon and Canon offerings. > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Bran Everseeking > <[email protected]> wrote: >> http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/01/camera-of-the-year-2010.html >> >> http://tinyurl.com/26be8ly >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
