The A850 and A900 are optimized for low ISO shooting. They use a
stronger Colour Filter Array than anything else short of a MF system
which gives them the best colour at low ISO's at the cost of poor high
ISO performance.

Note that if you downrez A900 files to APS-C resolutions you pick up
performance, the A900 downrez'd to 12MP delivers high ISO results only
about a half-stop behind a D700. But you need to downrez to get that
performance.

I'd expect the K-5 to provide similar performance in most regards,
with better High ISO performance out of the box and worse low-ISO
performance. Dynamic range should be similar though (the A900/A850
give up a bit of DR as well for the stronger CFA).

-Adam

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:05 PM, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good post. I suspect that the K-5 can outperform the A850 in all but pixel 
> count. But that's just a guess based on sensor tests and a wedding 
> photographer friend's comments regarding his A850.
> Paul
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 7:07 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> As I wrote earlier, my friends from DC (well, actually it is MD, but I like 
>> to think of this as DC) came for a visit and left. Among other things I did 
>> back up photos for my friend and I was given an opportunity to keep them for 
>> my examination. He has Sony A850 and an assortment of lenses, notably the 
>> famous Minolta Beer Can, Tamron 17-35/2.8-4.0 and Tamron 90/2.8 macro.
>>
>> I have looked and processed and examined and pixel peeped few dozen images 
>> and compared some of them side by side given that we were shooting at the 
>> same time on the same location.
>>
>> Few ideas crossed my mind:
>>
>> 1. Under bright day light Sony wins hands down. The exposure latitude and 
>> color fidelity are ahead of those of K-7. The dynamic range difference is 
>> evident once you start to play with curves and look into shadow-to-light 
>> transitions.
>>
>> 2. Under low light both cameras struggle, though my friend does not shoot 
>> above ISO 1600, while I shoot at ISO 3200. Given pixel count advantage, I 
>> think it might be possible to downsize Sony images to take care of some of 
>> the noise.
>>
>> So, on the surface it looks like naturally one might want to upgrade to 
>> either full frame or another Pentax camera with better sensor.
>>
>> On the other hand, I had to look at 1:1 or even 3:1 (300% magnification) and 
>> really side by side to see those differences. Of course playing with 
>> exposure slider makes different impression immediately, but beside that I 
>> really don't think that Pentax is so much behind. Let's say that the 
>> difference is 10-15% although I do admit and do realize that these 
>> percentage points are meaningless. What I am trying to say is that the 
>> difference is relatively small.
>>
>> I have some reservations about the aforementioned lenses' performance in 
>> some of the situations, but that's a different matter.
>>
>> Thankfully, I don't feel like I should or even must update from K-7 to K-5 
>> or to Canon 5DMk2 or whatever. I kind of used to feel that way having seen 
>> Paul's comparison shots from his basement.
>>
>> I also think that to say that camera A offers revolutionary improvements in 
>> IQ dept over camera B (*) would be a serious overstatement or simply a 
>> market speak.
>>
>> Well, at least I had my chance to vent.
>>
>> Boris
>>
>> (*) As long as both A and B are of similar general class. It stands to 
>> reason that 16x24 and 24x36 cameras are closer than it might have seemed 
>> initially.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to