On Jan 18, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Jack Davis wrote:

> You would slow the frame rate by increasing the time between frames..right?
> 
> Jack
> 

Yes, but if there's through-frame motion involved, it will also make the 
finished product look somewhat ragged, and at some point, it becomes more of a 
slide show than time lapse photography. 

Paul


> --- On Tue, 1/18/11, Cotty <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: Cotty <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: How to estimate picture frequency for time-lapse series?
>> To: "pentax list" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 6:35 AM
>> On 18/1/11, Cotty, discombobulated,
>> unleashed:
>> 
>>> Other subjects with little movement (cityscape?) might
>> be too slow, so
>>> try a frame every 5 secs etc.
>> 
>> see addended post.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>   Cotty
>> 
>> 
>> ___/\__
>> ||   (O)  | 
>>    People, Places, Pastiche
>> ----------      http://www.cottysnaps.com
>> _____________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
>> directly above and follow the directions.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to