2011/1/18 P. J. Alling <[email protected]>:
>>
> Well, yes and no.  Most of those charges, in the US at least stem from
> different statutes.  What they probably actually arrest you for is
> "resisting", then they tack the reliant statute onto that.  Which in a
> constitutional democracy what else should you do but resist illegal orders?

'fraid not, here's one link for your reference
http://www.dailytech.com/Man+Arrested+for+Photographing+Police+Officer+Who+Came+Into+His+House/article18838.htm
quote: "The police are basing this claim on a ridiculous reading of
the two-party consent surveillance law - requiring all parties to
consent to being taped"
Cheers
Ecke

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to