2011/1/18 P. J. Alling <[email protected]>: >> > Well, yes and no. Most of those charges, in the US at least stem from > different statutes. What they probably actually arrest you for is > "resisting", then they tack the reliant statute onto that. Which in a > constitutional democracy what else should you do but resist illegal orders?
'fraid not, here's one link for your reference http://www.dailytech.com/Man+Arrested+for+Photographing+Police+Officer+Who+Came+Into+His+House/article18838.htm quote: "The police are basing this claim on a ridiculous reading of the two-party consent surveillance law - requiring all parties to consent to being taped" Cheers Ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

