I'm trying to ignore the fact that this photo was taken with the DA*60-250. I mean, it's just wonderful IQ, photographic skill aside. I like a lens with a little reach, so this one is scary from a financial perspective..
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your infatuation with DA* 60-250 is progressing as steadily as your arms > are, Paul. I especially like the reflections on the bottom of the image, > they fit most nicely with the rest of it. It is therefore that I commend > your attention to detail /grin/. > > Boris > > > On 1/16/2011 5:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12112197&size=lg >> >> K-5, DA* 60-250/4, f5.6, 1/125th, 250mm, iso 400 >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
