Puppies, you want puppies. Everyone likes pictures of puppies.
On 1/20/2011 9:26 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I say this lightheartedly because, since I have no access to Paul's
skills, I can only hope for enhancement by optics ;-) Maybe I could
get some more dogs, however.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com> wrote:
Naturally, Steve, if you give Steady Paul a Holga or a pin hole camera,
he'll have a hard time producing image similar in measurable characteristic
to that of FA 31/1.8 Limited. I am only trying to say that Paul is excellent
photographer and give him a good gear, he'll take full advantage of it.
That's the only thing I am really trying to say - photographer is primary,
gear is secondary.
Boris
On 1/20/2011 3:09 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
That's an interesting question. A good photographer can produce a
"good" image with a bad lens but maybe not a really "sharp" image. To
some extent, sharpness is a function of the lens.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:43 AM, Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com> wrote:
I prefer to think of it the other way around - given solid gear, Paul
produces outstanding results. Or better yet, Paul is simply very capable
photographer regardless of the specific gear he uses, which by the way
was
illustrated with the pics he took on the motor show with the gear of
somewhat smaller caliber than DA* stuff.
On 1/20/2011 6:50 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I always thought it would be great to have the DA* 200 or DA*300, but
looking at Paul's work produced with this lens, this is the one I'd
purchase if I was going for this kind of reach. Yep, ahuh, for sure!
It's a great lens, as Paul's work demonstrates. Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven
Desjardins"<drd1...@gmail.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: PESO - Of one mind
I'm trying to ignore the fact that this photo was taken with the
DA*60-250. I mean, it's just wonderful IQ, photographic skill aside.
I like a lens with a little reach, so this one is scary from a
financial perspective..
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:32 AM, Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Your infatuation with DA* 60-250 is progressing as steadily as your
arms
are, Paul. I especially like the reflections on the bottom of the
image,
they fit most nicely with the rest of it. It is therefore that I
commend
your attention to detail /grin/.
Boris
On 1/16/2011 5:23 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12112197&size=lg
K-5, DA* 60-250/4, f5.6, 1/125th, 250mm, iso 400
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
