For the 50 billionth time Paul. In EVERYTHING I've said I have NEVER said newspapers fall under this.
On 1/19/11 3:02 PM, "Paul Stenquist" <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, if she's right every newspaper in the country and most of the magazines > are in big trouble. > Go put your fist through a wall. > > On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Elizabeth Masoner wrote: > >> >> Ok, I give up, I can¹t stay out of the conversation (I don¹t have anymore >> wall space that would like good with a fist punched through it). If I wait >> longer to email again I won¹t be polite so I¹ll email now while I still have >> some reasonable control over my language. >> >> Just read this it goes into the when/why/how more succinctly than anything >> any of us have typed so far. >> http://www.andrewkantor.com/useful/Legal-Rights-of-Photographers.pdf >> >> With regards to commercial usage >> >> Commercial Rights >> Commercial rights can be a very murky term when corporate lawyers get >> involved. However, a general explanation would be that commercial means any >> endeavor designed to create income or use by a commercial entity. Some >> examples would include: a sales brochure, magazine, advertisement, or >> billboard. >> >> Non-Commercial Rights >> Non-commercial rights would be items that are not designed to create >> significant income or use by individuals or other non-corporate type groups. >> Things such as church bulletins, or someone printing an image to put on >> their school binder would be non-commercial usage. >> >> >> >> ~Liz >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow >> the directions. > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
