So a retina (about 1100 mm^2) is bigger than FF (864 mm^2)? On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/26/2011 1:33 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: >> >> On 1/26/2011 12:12 AM, Bob W wrote: >>> >>> Hmm. That would not be photography. Photography is the _direct_ action of >>> light on the film / sensor. It would be photography if you replaced your >>> retina with Velvia. >>> >>> B >> >> I thought retina (tm) was some kind of display technology /wink wink/... >> >> Boris >> > Retina is capture technology. > > -- > Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom! > > --Marvin the Martian. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
