Oh, now there's an insult... On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:46 AM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 25/01/2011 10:19 AM, John Sessoms wrote: >> >> From: Steven Desjardins >>> >>> If you have a Porsche you still have to drive it. It doesn't mean >>> that a better driver won't do better in the Porsche than in a minivan. >>> >>> I don't question the central importance of the photographer. But if >>> the equipment doesn't matter then we're all idiots for spending all >>> this money on bodies and lenses. >>> >> >> But a "better driver" might well do better in a minivan than a poor >> driver in a Porsche. >> >> I'm not saying better equipment doesn't matter. I'm saying that >> improving yourself as a photographer matters *more* for you to get full >> value from that better equipment. >> >> Better equipment by itself won't improve your skills. At best, it offers >> less of an impediment for you to improve your skills. >> >> Case in point ... could any amount of better equipment make Kenny Boy a >> "better" photographer? >> >> > > You're like having a junior version of JCO on list. > > -- > > William Robb
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
