You realize that stochastic intransigence is another way of saying
random stubbornness.
On 1/30/2011 4:47 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
If you'd taken it with a Leica, the cognoscenti would admire its
stochastic intransigence. -T
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Ken Waller<[email protected]> wrote:
For those that think better equipment makes a photographer better (and
assuming he would then take better images) I throw this out for you to tell
me how 'better' equipment would make this a better photo.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=12483032
Taken with K20D, 70-210mm SMC Pentax F. 1/30 f16, ISO 200 on Gitzo 3530LS
with Bogen
mini gear head, other than the tripod, not exactly hi end gear. the K20D is
not 'as good' as say a
K-5, the 70-210 Pentax is good but not a superior lens.
Do I need a better camera body or lens or what and what effect will they
have on this image.
Should I have taken the money I spent on 2 weeks in Utah and bought better
equipment?
; - )
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
