On 1/30/2011 5:28 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
I admit folks, I fail to see why this idea is so controversial. The
best photographers often buy the best equipment. Maybe they can
overcome inferior equipment, but I simply point out that very few of
them bother to take this route.
If a good photographer can overcome bad equipment, why is it such a leap
of logic that better equipment may well help a mediocre photographer to
take better pictures?
How about better equipment making the process easier/more pleasurable?
If the camera "just works better", then would it not make better
pictures no matter what class of photographer is pushing the button?
If equipment didn't matter, St. Ansel would probably have used a Minolta
110 since it would have been easier to hump it around Yosemite.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
