On 11-01-30 8:29 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Jeez, I missed that and it's so obvious. What a terrible job.
On a related note, I used to use Micrografx software and it was much
easier to do a cut, feather and paste. I always find the feather
command harder to use in PS.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Elizabeth Masoner
<[email protected]> wrote:
It's a cat show - that sort of thing happens all the time at those. I meant
the hideous photoshopping of the cat.
On 1/30/11 7:07 PM, "Brian Walters"<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:43 -0600, "Elizabeth Masoner"
<[email protected]> wrote:
I just gotta laugh when I see stuff like this in the newspapers.
http://media.al.com/birmingham-news/photo/9234475-standard.jpg
I¹m willing to bet my 13 year old could do better.
Hmm. A photo of someone looking up a cat's bum is an unfortunate
composition but whether or not it's bad editing would surely depend on
the context.
For me the interesting slant in this piece is that one can get away with
even abysmal Photoshopping work and very few will notice. Look how many
photographers just on this list, folks with a highly developed visual
sense, who missed the PS botch in there!
So don't waste touch-up time; save the careful feathering for those
cormorant shots.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
