On Feb 3, 2011, at 7:19 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> It turns out that the catalog I wanted had gotten named >>>> 101231_working.lrcat.lrcat >>>> >>>> And it just didn't like the second .lrcat >>> >>> How'd you get there? >> >> I knew what directory the catalogs were in. I went there and typed >> >> grep -R 101128 * >> >> and it found that catalog, when I saw the filename I guessed that might be >> the problem so I renamed a copy of t to >> >> 101231_working_rename.lrcat > > Ah, that wasn't what I meant. How did you get to a point where you had > a "{filename}.lrcat.lrcat" in the first place?
rm -rf *clue* I have no idea. Lightroom must have decided that it was a good idea. There is no reason why that should be a problem, a first semester programming student should be able to have it parse out lrcat.lrcat.lrcat and have it work. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
