On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> 
> Now, question is - am I being abusive in this or is this whole idea wrong 
> from the start? Surely I can stop using any extra-textual mark up whatsoever, 
> but then I am afraid, the likelihood of being misunderstood or 
> misunderstanding the other person on my own will be greater.

You aren't being abusive, there are times when they are slightly annoying or 
distracting.  There are times, when  being non-standard, they seem to obfuscate 
more than they clarify. There are generally two schools of thought on the 
subject.  The first one is that people communicated by written word in the 
English language for many centuries without the use of emoticons.  They should 
not be needed.  On the other hand, we have people from a wide variety of 
cultures, with a wide range of ability in reading and writing of English. A 
great writer may not need emoticons to let the reader know when they are being 
sarcastic, but if James Thurber is on PDML, he's in full on lurk mode.

Fortunately, most of the people on PDML, when they encounter something that 
seems like it might be offensive, assume an error in communication and 
interpret things as if they weren't meant to be offensive. There are a few 
people that seem to enjoy taking offense at what others say, and my feeling is, 
fuckem.

There are a few fairly standard smilies such as :-) (for a smile) ;-) (for a 
flirty wink) but even those are not universal. Conservative use of them can 
convey an emotional subtext in a manner that most people will understand. Over 
use of them is rather annoying.  Your use of /wink/ *guffaw* _stern look_ or 
whatever is kind of like using lojban, it might convey exactly what you mean, 
unfortunately nobody else understands it.

> Have your say. You can be brutal and honest or you can even do it off the 
> list.

You do a damn sight better in English than I do in either Russian or Hebrew, so 
I'm certainly wiling to cut you a bit of slack.  My off list question was 
prompted because I could tell that you were trying to clarify rather than 
confuse, but that, at least for me, it wasn't working.

I also applaud your humility in that you're willing to ask about things like 
this and risk people telling you that you're doing things wrong.

--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to