On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 11:12 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > It's amazing to me that the Nikon is so big and heavy. Seems to defeat > the purpose of a discreet, 35mm camera.
Yep. But it is accepted as the default photojournalist 35. That's the point I'm trying to make...why is that acceptable to carry around, but the 67 is insanely gigantic? > However, it does include a > motor drive. How much bigger/heavier would the 67 be with a motor drive > or winder? Well, the 645n isn't that much bigger or heavier than, say, a Bronica 645 with no drive... -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
