Does that mean combining the sharp picture parts of different photos
into one photo? Amazing!
Jos
On 4-3-2011 22:32, Toine wrote:
He actually mentions stacking in the video. By the looks of the DOF it
must be a stack. The amazing part is he's getting usable stacks
handheld because the dof is as thin as a sheet of paper. I feel lucky
if I get one sharp picture from a series of 20 or 30 handheld.
On 4 March 2011 22:09, Eric Featherstone<[email protected]> wrote:
Toine's suggestion of focus stacking I'd have thought.
Eric.
On 4 March 2011 20:13, Jos from Holland<[email protected]> wrote:
Jostein, agree with you.
But some of the pictures in this clip have a much better than normal D.O.F.
for a K200 sensor, as if a much smaller sensor was used, what could be the
explanation?
Regards, Jos
On 4-3-2011 8:13, AlunFoto wrote:
To achieve at least a nominal depth of field, you need to stop down to
f/11 or f/16.
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Eric
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
