On Mar 25, 2011, at 5:19 PM, David Parsons wrote: > If you are going to do HDR, Photoshop's implementation is decent. If > you use Photomatix, it does the same thing, but renders differently. > If you've ever seen an HDR with the crazy surface patterns, it's a > good bet that it was done in Photomatix.
I'm not looking for the wild tone mapping, I'm looking for clean and natural looking images of pictures with wide dynamic range. > > It's a dark art to do it well. Whole books have been written on how > to make HDRs. You'll really need to have a vision of what you are > looking for, or all you'll be doing is moving sliders in software. > > -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
