For the same reason people think m43 is too big (at least in current incarnations). But, as you point it out, it brings problems inherent to sensor size (noise and DOF). It may get a market though. I know I wish my LX3 could change lens. Even with its small sensor (bigger than the 1/2.33 chosen for NC-1 though).
As long as Pentax does indeed introduce a second system with APS sensor I don't care much except that this NC-1 is.. UGLY. 'nuff said ;) 2011/3/30 eckinator <[email protected]>: > I think April fool's, too. That's not an EVIL/MILC but an > interchangeable lens P&S. Why would anyone in their right mind spend > money for a system camera where sensor IQ is the limiting factor? > > 2011/3/30 Jaume Lahuerta <[email protected]>: >> http://k-rumors.com/first-pictures-of-the-pentax-nc-1-system/ >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ KX, MX, SuperA+Motor, Z1, P30 Mamiya C330+80/2.8 Sekonic L-208 FalconEyes TE300D x2 Studio flashes Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
