On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:04 AM, John Sessoms wrote: > From: David Mann > >> On Apr 30, 2011, at 2:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >>> > Doug has fixed the list, and based on what little I know, it was anything >>> > but easy. Sorry you had to work so hard, but you can be sure that your >>> > efforts are deeply appreciated by all. >> Yes, very much so. I've occasionally had to deal with email-related >> problems at work. It's not something I particularly enjoy... the only thing >> I hate more than spam filters is spam! >> >> Dave >> > > If it doesn't include some way for the recipient to say this is *not* spam; > this is something I want to receive, it's not a filter, it's censorship.
Filtering spam is a huge task for IPs, so many of them delegate it to a service that specializes in that job. Apparently, when the spam-filtetring folks find a server that has been used to distribute spam, they cut it off. I find that better than the alternative. I get almost no spam and have only rarely lost contact with valued communicators. Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
