From: Paul Stenquist
On Apr 30, 2011, at 9:04 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: David Mann
On Apr 30, 2011, at 2:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Doug has fixed the list, and based on what little I
know, it was anything but easy. Sorry you had to work
so hard, but you can be sure that your efforts are
deeply appreciated by all.
Yes, very much so. I've occasionally had to deal with
email-related problems at work. It's not something I
particularly enjoy... the only thing I hate more than spam
filters is spam!
Dave
If it doesn't include some way for the recipient to say this is
*not* spam; this is something I want to receive, it's not a
filter, it's censorship.
Filtering spam is a huge task for IPs, so many of them delegate it to
a service that specializes in that job. Apparently, when the
spam-filtetring folks find a server that has been used to distribute
spam, they cut it off. I find that better than the alternative. I
get almost no spam and have only rarely lost contact with valued
communicators.
Paul
My unfortunate experience with Road-Runner is they let the spam through
and are unwilling to fix the problem when they do block valued
communicators instead.
But, my only alternative around here for high speed internet is
AT&T-BellSouth, for whom I have more negative feelings than I have for
Facebook.
For all their faults, and they are many and varied, I'm sticking with
Road-Runner until something better (read that as until someone with
competent tech support) comes along.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
