The thing about police (besides places that are trying to pass laws
restricting photographing police) is with shooting video of them in
states that require two-party notification before you record audio.
You by filming implicitly give your consent, but the police are not
giving consent and they can get you that way.

The two-party rule is why you'll hear the "This call is being recorded
for training, etc, etc" when you call some companies.  That is a
notification that you are being recorded, and if you continue on the
line, you are consenting to the recording.

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 6:23 PM, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In the US, if you are in a place open to the general public, and
> no prior restrictions were put in place as a condition of your
> admission, you can generally make non-commercial use of your
> own images, videos, etc.
>
> There are some restrictions (you aren't allowed to photograph
> the TSA screeners at the airport, for example), but that's the
> general rule.
>
> Mind you, you'll get a whole lot of grief if you try to take
> pictures in a public area showing small children at play.
> And some jurisdictions try to claim it's an offence to take
> pictures of the Police if they don't want you to.  While as far
> as I know no such legislation has stood up to a legal challenge,
> you can end up with a whole lot of grief if you insist.
>
> More relevant to your case, perhaps, might be the example of
> seasonal displays at shopping malls (Santa's Grotto, the Easter
> Bunny, etc.).  There will usually be explicit notices stating
> that using your own camera is prohibited.  While I'm not sure
> that they could actually do anything to prevent you (other than
> ask you to leave), I'd generally recommend that one should comply
> with such requests.  But in the absence of such a notice, there's
> not a lot they can do a posteori.
>
>
>> I am talking about USA, where all the action is happening described
>> in the previous message.
>>
>> Igor
>>
>> Tue May 3 16:19:51 EDT 2011
>> John Francis wrote:
>>
>> > It depends on the legal system that has jurisdiction.
>> >
>> > Just look at the issues that Google is having with StreetView;
>> > there's no uniformity in what they are or are not allowed to
>> > do - it has to be separately adjudicated in each country.
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com

Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to