Pentax users would definitely benefit from more lenses on the market. I could certainly use a good 85/1.4.
On May 4, 2011, at 1:53 PM, Miserere wrote: > http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/samsung-itself-leaks-a-300mm-f2-8-xf-ed-lens-on-youtube/ > > I suspect this is a lens that would have been introduced for their > Pentax-cloned GX series of DSLRs (see? it's not and OT post), but > never did because they moved away from mirrors and Pentax. The lens > focuses in the same direction as Pentax lenses, i.e., the correct way, > while Sammy's NX lenses focus in the opposite direction, i.e., the > wrong way. > > I wonder what other lenses they were working on... Some think Sammy's > upcoming NX 85mm f/1.4 was initially designed for K-mount. > > So let me ask the question: If Samsung had started developing their > own line of lenses for K-mount, would you guys have been happy? The > Sammy lenses I've used so far have been quite nice; those that I've > seem pictures from online seem equally good. Wouldn't Pentax have > benefited from having Samsung producing higher end lenses such as the > 85mm f/1.4? > > I'm curious to hear what y'all think. > > > —M. > > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > > http://EnticingTheLight.com > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
