Paul, The 135/3.5K is a very fine lens. I've got some moonrise shots, taken with mine, that I need to get developed. If I'm right they will be nice.
Looks to me like some of the M lenses made too many compromises in order to achieve their smaller size. Almost like Pentax came up with the the ME/MX bodies and then realized that the K lenses were a little big on them. So they "rushed" the M lenses. Or maybe it was just harder to engineer compact optics than a compact camera in the mid-70's. Most of the A lenses are compact, and optically back up to Pentax standard. Just my $.02. Mark BTW - It's been a month since my former employer let me go. I'm just now getting caught up on a lot of things and I hope to be able to participate on the list more regularly. Also a shameless plug: I am now working as an IS Consultant, any & all assignments welcome. -- Gosdin Information Systems Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] P.O. Box 330 www.gosdin.net Warner, OK 74469-0330 918-441-1678 - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
