On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:29 AM, John Francis <[email protected]> wrote:
> All hosting sites have terms and conditions that allow them to display the > images > (well, duh, you think, but ...), and to allow them to use the images, in > context, > to promote their own services. > > Flickr went a *lot* further than that. Can you be specific? All I'm seeing from anyone so far is vague allusions and FUD. There's nothing particularly damning regarding "ownership" of images at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flickr#Controversy Nor are Google searches like [flickr license controversy] leading me to anything useful. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
