Sunday, February 24, 2002, 7:20:09 AM, Doug wrote:
DF> Howdy, folks,

DF> In my search (and procrastination) for a scanner, I was reading this
DF> review a few minutes ago:

DF> http://www.hively.com/canoscan/

DF> Just in the first paragraph of the section "Jumping right in to the
DF> scan quality from negatives", he makes the following comment:

>> When it comes to scanning at 4000dpi, however, you can see how
>> the lens on the SLR camera gives you cleaner, sharper photos,
>> than those on the point-and-shoot.

DF> I'd be interested to know whether this agrees with the collective
DF> experience of the PDML.

DF> TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Absolutely NOT!

;-)

Doug, is it Friday yet or what ?

Good light,
   Frantisek Vlcek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to